Volume 45, Issue 1
(March 2016)

< Previous Next >



Current Issue
Available Issues

Alerts for the Journal

Click to get an email alert for every new issue of

School Psychology Review

Journal Information

Online ISSN:  
Frequency: Quarterly
RSS Feed:
(What is this?)
rrs icon

Register for a Profile

Not Yet Registered?

Benefits of Registration Include:

  • A Unique User Profile that will allow you to manage your current subscriptions (including online access)
  • The ability to create favorites lists down to the article level
  • The ability to customize email alerts to receive specific notifications about the topics you care most about and special offers

Register Now!

Previous Article
Volume 45, Issue 1
(March 2016)
Next Article
  • Add to Favorites
  • |
  • Share Article
  • |
  • Export Citations
  • |
  • Track Citations (RSS | Email)
  • |
  • Permissions

  • Full-text
  • PDF

Meta-Analysis of Behavioral Self-Management Interventions in Single-Case Research

Amy M. Briesch and Jacquelyn M. Briesch

Northeastern University

Correspondence regarding this article should be addressed to Dr. Amy Briesch, Northeastern University, Department of Counseling & Applied Educational Psychology, 404 International Village, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, Phone: 617-373-8291, e-mail: .

Associate Editor: Rich Gilman

Article accepted by previous Editor

Abstract

The current study meta-analyzed 47 single-subject studies of behavioral self-management interventions that were published between 1971 and 2011. In addition to obtaining an overall measure of effect across all self-management studies (φ = 0.93), analyses were conducted to assess whether treatment effectiveness was moderated by factors such as student characteristics (e.g., grade level, student disability) or the intervention components included. Although no significant differences were identified depending on the grade level of the student or educational setting, lower effect sizes were identified for students diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and specific learning disabilities. Additionally, stronger effect sizes were identified in those studies that (a) assessed student rating accuracy, (b) asked students to reflect on their behavior over a period of time, and (c) did not incorporate evaluation or rewards. The implications of these findings for applied use and future research are discussed.

Received: March 4, 2014; Accepted: November 28, 2014;

Copyright 2016 by the National Association of School Psychologists