Volume 44, Issue 3
(September 2015)

< Previous Next >



Current Issue
Available Issues

Alerts for the Journal

Click to get an email alert for every new issue of

School Psychology Review

Journal Information

Online ISSN:  
Frequency: Quarterly
RSS Feed:
(What is this?)
rrs icon

Register for a Profile

Not Yet Registered?

Benefits of Registration Include:

  • A Unique User Profile that will allow you to manage your current subscriptions (including online access)
  • The ability to create favorites lists down to the article level
  • The ability to customize email alerts to receive specific notifications about the topics you care most about and special offers

Register Now!

Previous Article
Volume 44, Issue 3
(September 2015)
Next Article
  • Add to Favorites
  • |
  • Share Article
  • |
  • Export Citations
  • |
  • Track Citations (RSS | Email)
  • |
  • Permissions

  • Full-text
  • PDF

Integrating Theory and Empirical Science in School Psychology: Progress and Remaining Challenges

Jan N. Hughes

Department of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jan N. Hughes, 4225 TAMU, College Station, TX ; e-mail:

Jan Hughes is Professor Emerita of Educational Psychology at Texas A&M University. She is the principal investigator of a 15-year longitudinal study of peer school, and home influences on children's academic and social trajectories funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Action Editor: Matthew Burns

Abstract.

This article reviews progress made since Hughes (2000a) criticized intervention research in school psychology for insufficient consideration of theory. A review of contemporary intervention research published in journals specifically identified with the specialty of school psychology supports the conclusion that current school psychology intervention research is much more theory driven, less insular, and more developmental than it was in 2000. The author highlights intervention studies that exemplify these changes and suggests areas for continued improvement in four areas: (a) articulating and testing the presumed processes responsible for treatment effects, (b) testing boundaries of treatment effectiveness, (c) broadening evaluation of treatment effects to include potential negative effects of intervention, and (d) testing maintenance of intervention effects at least 1 year after treatment.

Received: May 6, 2015; Accepted: May 18, 2015;

Copyright 2015 by the National Association of School Psychologists